Get the verdict
Same-prompt test 20 · image · October 2026

YouTube thumbnail: which AI does it best?

Nano Banana 2.1 wins with 8.7/10. Behind it: Ideogram 4.0 (8.0). One image per model, unedited.

The promptYouTube thumbnail: a shocked man pointing at a giant glowing graph, high contrast.
#ModelOveralladherencequalityartifactsCostRender
1Nano Banana 2.18.7998$0.0437s
2Ideogram 4.08.0888$0.0726s

Best per category: adherence Nano Banana (9) · quality Nano Banana (9) · artifacts all tied (8)

Every output, ranked

#1 Nano Banana 2.1

Nano Banana 2.1 output Nano Banana 2.1 8.7
~4 cr ($0.04) · 37s render

adherence 9quality 9artifacts 8
Strong shocked face, high contrast, glowing graph; busy numbers.

#2 Ideogram 4.0

Ideogram 4.0 output Ideogram 4.0 8.0
~7 cr ($0.07) · 26s render

adherence 8quality 8artifacts 8
Pointing at glowing graph, added 'INSANE!' text; shock is mild.

Try Gemini (Nano Banana) ↗

⚖️
Outputs are shown exactly as the API returned them (resized previews; tap for the original). Scores are editorial judgments on a fixed rubric, given without knowing which model made each output. One run is a snapshot, not a guarantee. Methodology

FAQ

Which AI is best for "AI YouTube thumbnail"?

In our October 2026 test of this exact prompt, Nano Banana 2.1 wins with 8.7/10, ahead of Ideogram 4.0 (8.0). Nano Banana 2.1's output: Strong shocked face, high contrast, glowing graph; busy numbers.

What exact prompt was used?

“YouTube thumbnail: a shocked man pointing at a giant glowing graph, high contrast.” Every model got the same prompt with default settings, and one best-effort retry only if a generation failed.

How were the outputs scored?

Each output was scored without knowing which model made it, from 1 to 10 on adherence, quality, artifacts. The overall score is the average of those.